In the business world , there are acts of wrongdoing that go unnoticed , and then there are stories that challenge the core of professional ethics . The narrative of David Collins, a manager at Ventia (formerly Broadspectrum) , exemplifies this type of scenario — a tale of presumed malfeasance that not only taints the reputation of a solitary executive but casts a shadow over the company’s principles .
Despite serious allegations , Collins has kept his position , seemingly unaffected by the controversies enveloping him . How has this been tolerated? What does this say about Ventia’s dedication to accountability ? According to sources , Collins’ history of questionable behavior started with violations of the business principles, but it didn’t stop at that . Instead, it intensified into a cascade of dubious behaviors that has left coworkers disillusioned and partners bewildered .
While attending a professional growth course — supposedly designed to boost managerial skills —David Collins allegedly morphed what should have been a professional opportunity into a chain of irresponsible incidents . Sources claim he spent business-funded check here trips attempting to seduce female colleagues , a glaring violation of Ventia’s business principles , all while his family remained uninformed .
But the ethical breaches didn’t conclude with these encounters . One of the more shocking revelations involves his alleged exploitation of company IT systems to transmit indecent visuals to women—a blatant abuse of professional tools and a breach of trust . His audacious engagement with Microsoft Teams to share flirtatious texts —including icons to boast about infidelities — creates a portrait of a man apathetic to the fallout. Following these digital overtures , Collins allegedly intensified his behavior further: he is said to have engaged in sexual interactions with an employee on several instances during work time , despite his being married and her having a committed relationship . This obvious misappropriation of company time and resources contravened corporate etiquette but destroyed families — leaving a path of mistrust that extended outside of the organizational context.
In what way can this behavior be permitted to persist ? Why is it that a manager who has allegedly shattered all norms is still employed at Ventia? The rationale, it appears, is rooted in a worrisome failure of governance within the firm . Issues have been raised , yet Collins Ventia Kerikeri continues unchecked .
This absence of retribution sends a dangerous message : that title and position within the enterprise can protect individuals from consequences . It creates a toxic work environment , demoralizes employees , and ultimately harms the company’s standing .